Making the turn, child in tow. |
Lombard and 27th are effectively one street that bends awkwardly at approximately 90 degrees, at the point where the nomenclature changes.
So this 90 degree thingy, is it a curve, or is it a turn? The people who designed and built this little stretch of road seem to have been genuinely conflicted by this question.
Lombard and 27th Street come together. |
Points in favor of ramp. There's no traffic light at Taney, the cross street just before 27th. (I think the ramp vibe starts at Taney.) There is also no traffic light at 27th, where there is, admittedly, no cross traffic. But the lack of a signal at these locations is a signal.
As you come to the turn, you'll notice the designers have gone to considerable effort to at least make it look like it's not a full 90 degree turn. The road widens substantially at the corner and the curbs don't form right angles, but instead present gentle, wide curves. On the inner side of the turn, this effect is enhanced by the judicious use of paint. All this encourages people to act as if they're swinging along on an interstate access ramp.
Finally, there are no crosswalks at Lombard and 27th. I personally think you'd have to be insane to try to walk across the street here, crosswalks or no crosswalks. But it's another little clue that this is not a city street.
(There are no crosswalks across Lombard at Taney either. People do walk across the street in this area with some regularity. Remember, there are lots and lots of people walking on the bridge, and they have to get there somehow.)
Points against ramp. If the turn at Lombard and 27th actually was an interstate access ramp, the curve would be banked. A banked roadway makes it easier for cars to turn; it also means that all drainage goes to the low side of the bank, which in this case would be the left side of the road.
Instead, the street at this point has a crown in the middle and drains to both sides. This means that people on the right side of the road are turning on a surface that has reverse camber. The problem with reverse camber in a turn is that it tends to throw you off the road. Which is why curves are generally banked.
Not surprisingly motorists tend to steer through this area slightly to the left of the crown, where the camber helps them turn. When they do this they need to avoid a large storm drain located in a depression in the pavement. They can do this by going to the right of the storm drain, or by straddling it. You don't want to put a wheel in that depression.
A storm drain for the motorists. |
What's going on? I think the cartway's profile here is driven less by the needs of drivers and more by some thorny issues of drainage. The intersection of 27th and Lombard is at the bottom of two hills, one running down Lombard and the other coming down 27th from the bridge. When it rains, this intersection is definitely collecting storm water from a pretty wide area.
In addition to watching motorists, I've been watching bicyclists navigate through this area. They're hardly ever in the bike lane at the corner. They're to the left of it, I think for two main reasons: First, the higher route allows for a gentler curve. Second, there is a fearsome storm drain designed to catch the wheels of bicycles and eat them, and it's located at the curb in a particularly infelicitous spot. (I've also heard comments about gravel gathering in this spot. I wouldn't be surprised, since it's at the bottom of two hills. I just didn't see it.)
Storm drain in the bike lane. |
Riding the curve. |
Another interesting, neighboring point, is the impossible 90-degree turn heading North up the hill on 27th onto South - where bike and car traffic must intermix in a free-for-all zone that terrifies me every time.
ReplyDeleteYou mean the turn onto the bridge? Cars always cross into the bike lane.
DeleteAnnnnd along comes CHOP and the Roberts Building geniuses, who called it "an isolated site, far from transit..." and designed their project from the beginning to be car-intensive, with a ramp cutting across the sidewalk and bike lane, and 250-surface-parking-lot spaces. How all these extra cars will get in and 575 times a year is not their problem, they have decided. Ugh. Yes, I live on the 600 block of S. 27th Street, "the 1-block stub that feeds cars onto the bridge" but is also home to 13, um, homes and is really a terrible feeder street, getting jammed at the drop of a hat. Only blessing is that the miserable original design for 6 lanes of traffic never happened. You are so right about that corner... I bike nearly every day and feel like I have never come home the same way twice, and have never felt safe on that stretch. mcget / trophybikes PHL
ReplyDeleteA thought: if that entire El cart way were narrowed to just the volume AND SPEEDS it needs to handle I think both the final block of Lombard and the lonely block of 13 houses on 27th Street might become gracious urban ways. 1) traffic flow would be unchanged
ReplyDelete2) coordinated traffic signaling now possible means that such "smart" signals (that means 'traffic lights') could be considered at Lombard's two troubled junctures of Taney and of 27th;
3) with now unneeded roadway sidewalks, possibly on both L+R sides could be widened, and;
4) planted with continuous rain gardened beds capable of also absorbing motorcar & bus noise.
Sounds like a design CHARRETTE onsite with Streets division?